
Researcher offers ideas for fighting negativity in church leadership
When a leader tries to bring about change in a religious institution,
all kinds of opinions, values, fears and institutional tradition
begin to make a random attack on new ideas or proposed transformations. Even a determined leader, whether a lay person or clergy, will
have a difficult time breaking through the negativism of the entrenched
leadership. Much of the opposition to new ideas may be hidden in the history
of the congregation - past presidents or council members who take
potshots from a distance and tend to derail innovation with a
sour approach to the future. But a new book, due out in November and written by noted researcher
Merton Strommen, says innovation is usually stalled by a few people
who can be brought into a change culture if the proper approach
is followed. Strommen is a Lutheran clergyman and a lifelong researcher
who founded Search Institute and the Youth and Family Institute,
both in Minneapolis. Strommen's book, "The Innovative Church" (Augsburg
Fortress Publishers), lays the blame for a dead congregation squarely
on the atmosphere generated among the believers. If you've had
the opportunity to visit a number of different congregations in
your life, you know how quickly a visitor can spot a congregation
that is open to change, as opposed to a tightly controlled church
with a domineering pastor. Yes, there are still a few heavy-handed pastors around who
are threatened by people with new ideas, know how to shut down
change and dread the future because each day brings new enemies
and fresh conflicts. But we also know pastors who motivate their congregations to
reach out to solve community needs and encourage people with a
graceful message and Bible-based mission. Those clergy are the
stars in the religious institutions of the future. Strommen says
three qualities are necessary for pastors to succeed in our age. First, they must be committed to change. That doesn't mean
that change has to be constant or that innovation is pushed just
for fun. All that turmoil wouldn't be worth enduring unless there
was a pressing need that a few changes could solve. Second, an effective pastor will be a person of encouragement.
Long gone are clergy who see their principal duty as the moral
judge of congregational members. Rather, the clergy who take congregations
to new heights these days affirm members and leave the judging
to another level of intelligence. Certainly, one of the duties of a pastor or rabbi is to help
people find a moral balance in life. But that kind of duty doesn't
have to be harsh and punitive. If it is, people struggling with
moral choices will look for kinder and gentler clergy. Third, pastors of innovative congregations, Strommen's book
says, will be open to change and new ideas. That openness will
extend to the lay leadership. It will also reach out to those
on the fringe who may have good ideas but can't implement them
because they lack a connection with the lay leadership. Strommen says early in the book that the best way to bring
those fringe members into the mix and allow them a part in decision
making is to create task forces that exist beyond the traditional
administrative committees governing the congregation. Those committees are often burdened with financial concerns
and complaints from the congregation. Over time, committees could
become gatekeepers who always have a lock snapped onto the door
of the church. But task forces single out an issue, study the
problem thoroughly and then create a plan of action. When they come to the gatekeeping committees, they generate
enthusiasm rather than fear. The task force presents its study,
shows the plan of action and pledges its commitment. Who could
resist? This is an excellent book, particularly for those congregations
that are now beginning to see a bleak future and are searching
for a better way. But even innovative congregations will find
help in the extensive research carried out by Strommen during
the past 15 years. Clark D. Morphew
October 18, 1997